IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Business Strategy
Pursuing Eco-Innovation Within Southeastern European Clusters
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

This paper explains Eco-Innovation (EI) activities of clusters deriving from 11 countries of Southeastern European (SEE) region. The study indicates that more than a half of the analyzed clusters in the SEE region have set objectives related to EI in their cluster strategies, while just a few of them primarily focused on EI. Thus, results suggest that being primarily focused on EI is positively correlated with most of the activities related to EI which are being implemented. These activities are mostly oriented towards spreading information and awareness-raising, while not towards investing ‘heavily’ in the implementation of EI. This study offers an outline of the current situation regarding EI activities in the analyzed clusters of the SEE region. Other findings of this paper are: first, clusters have the influential power/potential to steer companies towards engagement in EI by setting the objectives and focus on EI, and second, clusters’ primary focus is related to the extent of EI’s activities.

 
 
 

Eco-Innovations (EI) bring benefits to the environment and companies and hence provide a win-win situation for both of them (Horbach, 2008). El may focus on a whole life cycle of products, processes, etc. in order to release less harmful substances and take care of the environment by reducing environmental impact (Fraj-Andres et al., 2009; EIO, 2010 in EIO, 2013; Angelo et al., 2012; and Horbach et al., 2012). While on the other hand, by implementing El, companies strengthen their competitive advantage (Shrivastava, 1995; Tien et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006; Triebswetter and Wackerbauer, 2008; Fraj-Andres et al., 2009; Ar, 2012; Hofer et al., 2012; Mourad and Ahmed, 2012; Wong, 2012; Leonidou et al., 2013; and Robinson and Stubberud, 2013). Among the most common benefits from companies’ successful implementation of El are the positive effects on: eco-efficiency (Mourad and Ahmed, 2012), expansion on foreign markets and export performance (Beise and Rennings, 2005; Gurau and Ranchhod, 2005; Martin-Tapia et al., 2008 and 2010; Cassiman and Golovko, 2011; Aguilera- Caracuel et al., 2012; and D’Angelo et al., 2013), company’s reputation (Shrivastava, 1995), company performance (Clemens, 2006; Zeng et al., 2011; Doran and Ryan, 2012; Cheng et al., 2013; Cruz-Cazares et al., 2013; and Rexhauser and Rammer, 2013), sustainable growth in domestic and international markets (European Commission, 2012) and many others.

The motives which steer companies and clusters towards implementing EIs have also been discussed. Hence researchers (Eiadat et al., 2008; and Hillestad et al., 2010) suggested that the integration of corporate social responsibility and environmental awareness in company’s business strategy may lead to enhanced reputational advantages. Holtbrugge and Dogl (2012) added that environmental awareness and improved company’s reputation can indirectly affect company’s gain of competitive advantage.

 
 
 

Business Strategy, Pursuing Eco-Innovation, Southeastern, Eco-Innovation (EI), Southeastern European (SEE), Eco-Innovations (EI), Hypothesis Development, European Clusters.