Audit expectation gap is an important issue which is discussed mostly as part of accounting revolution in the modern era. The audit expectation gap is the difference between beliefs of financial statement users and performance of accountants and auditors who prepare audits. Experts view that this gap can be minimized only if the auditors take responsibility of the certification of financial statements, and further gauge the early warnings of business fraud. This study concludes that audit expectation gap results due to the deficiencies of auditor, auditor independence, audit process, regulatory mechanism and the society at large.
After
industrial revolution, large-Scale companies were established in the middle of
18th century. The advent of professional management, made the development
of professional manager who were separated from investors and auditor, who lent
credibility to managements financial support. This changed the practice of appointing
a person to perform audit functions among the stockholders and resulted in the
rise of the auditing firms.
The
term `audit' is derived from the Latin word `audire,' which means `to hear' and
auditor literally means `hearer'. The function of the auditor was declaring that
the accounts kept by the management and the financial statements prepared by them
were `true and correct' and it provided an assurance against fraud and mismanagement.
The function by the auditor was gradually transformed from verifying all transactions
to verify sample transactions and this was practiced because of the burgeoning
volume of business activity. This functional shift in audit also caused a paradigm
shift in audit role from `true and correct view' to `true and fair view' with
a change in audit opinion from `complete assurance' to `reasonable assurance'.
In this background of evolution of audit, the AAA (1973) defines auditing as "a
systematic process of objectively gathering and evaluating evidences related to
assertions about economic actions and events in which the the individual or organization
making the assertions has been engaged, to ascertain the degree of correspondence
between those assertions and established criteria, and communicating the results
to users of the reports in which the assertions are made." |