Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of International Relations :
Learning from Sri Lanka's Eelam Wars
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Situating India in the evolving Central Eurasian Matrix is an exploration in the ever changing post-Soviet geo-political scene filled with competing powers with conflicting interests. The theater of Central Eurasia, often associated with the concepts like Great Game and New Great Game, has acquired increasing significance in the post-Cold War scenario. The Great Game, which was coined in the age of imperialism and colonialism had brought the Anglo-Russian rivalry in the region to its peak. After the end of the World War-II, the region gained importance not only due to its strategic position, but also due to its rich energy resources. In the post-Cold War post-Soviet space, the emergence of the region as a hotbed of competing politics has led to the rise of various alignments. Whether it is religious fundamentalism or nation-building travails, their overarching impact on India cannot be overlooked. In this background, India needs to develop a multitask policy to develop partnership with the region. India's energy needs can also be largely met by exploring partnership with the countries in the region.

So far there is no commonly agreed definition of Central Eurasia. Scholars debate on the formulation of a proper definition of this concept. Some of them argue that the post-Soviet space can be called Central Eurasia, while some others argue that the former Soviet Central Asia can be called Central Eurasia. Nevertheless, almost all the scholars agree that Central Eurasia is a broader and all-encompassing subject. John Schoeberlein attempts at a broader definition of the concept under which he includes "lands from the Iranian Plateau, the Black Sea, and the Volga Basin through Afghanistan, Southern Siberia, and the Himalayas to Muslim and Manchu regions of China and the Mongol lands". Robert M Cutler employs seven scales of analysis in his theory on Central Eurasia.The first scale of analysis is the national scale i.e., state level analysis where each of the Central Asian countries may be taken separately for study. Second, there is the regional scale of Central Asia itself, which takes the five former Soviet republics as a whole. Third, the `macro-region' of Greater Central Asia includes `political' Central Asia (i.e., the five states) plus their cultural and economic connections with such neighboring regions as Western China, Southern Russia, Northern Afghanistan and Northeastern Iran. Fourth, is the `meta-regional' scale, a still broader construct, which include Turkic, Mongolian, Iranian, Caucasian, Tibetan and other peoples and it extends from the Black sea region, the Crimea and the Caucasus in the west, through the Middle Volga region, Central Asia and Afghanistan and on to Siberia, Mongolia and Tibet in the east. The fifth, `mega-regional' scale of analysis includes not only Russia and China but also the whole of South and Southwest Asia, from India and Pakistan through Iraq and Turkey. A sixth scale of analysis is Greater Eurasia, from Spain to Sakhalin and Spitzbergen to Singapore including the European Union (EU) and its family of institutions. Finally, the seventh scale of analysis is the global scale, which includes the US, American transnational corporations with a global reach, and worldwide international organizations especially having economic, industrial or financial vocation.

 
 
 

Learning from Sri Lanka's Eelam Wars,Central, includes, Afghanistan, economic, competing, concept, partnership, countries, Siberia, corporations, cultural, background, European, exploring, formulation, fundamentalism, Himalayas, imperialism, industrial, international, metaregional', Mongol, nationbuilding, organizations, overlooked, allencompassing, changing, commonly, colonialism