Very often managers deem that in the fast changing business
scenario setting single-handed task accomplishment is becoming
extremely difficult. The work also involves complexity;
even response time is very less. In such circumstances,
it is often desirable to set a group of knowledge workers
to complete the task with perfection and punctuality. To
remain competitive, organizations should have the right
blend of expertise, skill, knowledge and efficiency. The
group should act with flexibility and cohesion. When we
look at the teams in the organizations, we observe two main
components in them; leader and its members. Keeping in view
the changing work environments, are our traditional leadership
styles applicable, or do they require some rethinking and
revamping?
The word `leader' is as old as socialization. Days have
gone where leaders were war heroes who were charming, alluring,
fascinating - in short charismatic. They created the troop
of followers by means of their charm and grace. They were
prophetic and the searchlight of attention. The charismatic
leader used to gather followers by dint of personality and
charm, rather than any form of external power or authority.
Subsequently came the transformational leaders, like Hitler.
A person with vision and passion who could achieve great
things. Their way of getting things done was by injecting
enthusiasm and energy. After that people-oriented leaders
like Mahatma Gandhi took responsibility of the followers
and had responsibility towards society and the disadvantaged.
People who want to help others best do this by leading them.
Now is the era of `Quiet' leaders, the leader who combines
professional will with personal humility like, Infosys's
Narayan Murthy.
The standpoint that an individual who has the experience,
knowledge, appeal, visualization, decision-making ability,
interpersonal skills, respect, standing, role (position),
etc., will lead. Fairly, this brings about the belief that
a single individual with enormous leadership abilities who
is the recognized leader can lead to a successful future,
but the need of the hour is individuals, who are group members,
to take on the responsibility for leadership. And also the
levels of high expectations, performance-oriented jobs,
cultural diversities, and cross-functional teams are some
of the compelling reasons that influence the shift from
traditional leadership to shared leadership. `Shared Leadership'
is an act of sharing responsibility, depending upon the
complexity of the situation. A small word can be co-leadership
having horizontal movement with the ultimate goal being
proving successful.
|