The world is rich in its history of leaders whose feats
of glory have been chronicled over the years and leadership
is a term most witnessed/heard of ever since man began to
live in an organized group. From the ancient period when
the early civilizations existed man has been guided, protected
and led by a leader. Throughout the timeline leaders have
emerged in all circumstances. No man can work as an island
and the `T' of the team is imperfect without the team leader.
Over the ages we have seen how empires and kingdoms have
risen and fallen both because of good or bad leadership.
Why then today do we talk so much about this primitive concept,
`leadership'?
During the ancient and medieval period, before the Renaissance,
we find the rule of the jungle`survival of the fittest'was
also applicable in the human society. Surviving and controlling
was done by the strong among the group. Others succumbed
to his physical pressure. After the Renaissance, when man
began to ask questions, he understood that intellect plays
a greater role than physical strength.
Gradually the parameters
to select the leader began to change. Physical fitness or
strength was no longer the single criterion. Leaders in
different parts of the world began to emergefor various
qualities and reasons. It was established gradually that
leaders are born, but cannot be trained. Leaders will stand
out among the crowd by being different. Post-Renaissance,
the idea of, "Theirs not to make reply, Theirs not
to reason why," began to fade out and men experienced
the urge to question, to seek out the truth and then make
decisions based on facts, not prejudice. Their inner vision
drove them towards `innovation' which helped them to achieve
their mission. |