Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
MBA Review Magazine:
Workplace, Changing Paradigms
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Management thinkers have dreamt for decades about a new future for management, but the realization of it awaited the right proportion of knowledge workers.

 
 
 

The old model of management was formed to deal with a set of circumstances that are very different from than the ones organizations face today. Industrial workers were proliferating at the turn of the last century. Many knew only craft or home-based labor and were unfamiliar with working in large organizations. Most of them were relatively uneducated; many were motivated to work hard only by external pressure. Employees were often in unions; managers were not. Industrial work was not yet very productive and substantial analysis and redesign was necessary to improve it. The concept of "bureaucracy," formulated by the sociologist Max Weber, was considered a positive attribute involving professionalism, clear division of labor and work roles that were independent of the individual.

Of course, knowledge workers are difficult to define, and they are not all of a piece. All workers employ some knowledge to do their jobs, so we must resort to classifying them by the proportion of their time spent doing so. And there are undoubtedly several different types of knowledge workers, each requiring different work environments and leadership approaches. One obvious distinction, for example, is between knowledge creators and knowledge users. Knowledge creators are workers who create innovative new ideas and approaches for use by their organizations. This category might include scientists in research and development organizations, particularly innovative product development , process designers and creative academicians.

Knowledge workers can also be distinguished by the types of ideas with which they deal. While the scope and scale of ideas undoubtedly represent a continuum, let's split it into big ideas and small ones. Big ideas are those that dramatically change people and organizations-ideas for new products, services, business models and strategic directions. "We should develop a computer with a point-and-click operating system that's much easier to use than any other", is an example of big idea knowledge, it was someone's thinking, perhaps Steve Jobs's, at Apple Computer in the mid-1980s. By definition, an organization can pursue relatively few of these big ideas because they require a lot of time and effort to implement. Then there are the small ideas. These are minor improvements in what organizations produce or how they work. "Let's put glass shelves in our refrigerators so that customers can see through them into the back," is an example of the type of small ideas that happen every day. Small ideas are analogous to quality management and continuous process improvement; big ideas are analogous to process innovation, the start-from-scratch, think-out-of-the-box approach to change.

 
 
 

MBA Review Magazine, Workplace, Changing Paradigms, Leadership, Business Models, Apple Computer, quality Management, Knowledge Eeconomy, knowledge Management, Michael Carter, World Bank, Information Technology, IT, , Research and Development, R&D, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, CSIR.