The introductory scene represents the commonly followed process of strategic planning. While numerous theorists and consulting agencies have developed different models of strategic planning, most methods of planning focus on the same essential elements: run a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis, establish objectives, and create organized steps toward attainment. This model is typically adopted because its formal process fits neatly inside formal organizations. However, many criticisms of formal strategic planning have arisen over the years. Martin argues that valid strategy employs a creative synthesis of two contrasting logics (where to play and how to win), rather than one simple, linear analytic process. Mintzberg, Ahlstrand and Lampel expand on this idea when they write “Because analysis is not synthesis, strategic planning has never been strategy making.” Strategic planning is merely analysis, and without a proper synthesis of various positions, estimates and objectives, there is no value in analysis alone.
|