Service quality has become the most dominant theme in services
marketing research (Grönroos, 1984; Jacoby
and Olson, 1985; and Parasuraman et al., 1988). Grönroos (1984) has
defined service quality as "the outcome of an evaluation process, where the
customers compare their expectations with the
service they have received". Parasuraman et
al. (1985) define service quality as
consumers' comparisons between service expectation and service performance. They suggest
that service quality is determined by the differences between customers'
expectations of the service and their perceptions of
the service experience (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Cronin and Taylor (1992)
have argued that the conceptualization of service
quality as a gap between expectations and performance is inadequate. Teas (1993
and 1994) also criticized the conceptual foundation of the
disconfirmation paradigm.
The growth of the service industries and the competition between the private
and public sector banks have resulted in an increased need for service providers
to identify the gaps in the market in order to improve service provisions to
retain customers. The Indian banking sector has responded to these needs and are
paying more attention to improve service quality. The field of banking was dominated
by large public sector banks till the 1990s. The liberalization policy of the Government
of India permitted entry to foreign and private banks in the banking
industry, leading to increased competition. Public sector banks are facing increasingly
more competition, whereas foreign and private sector banks are trying to win
customer loyalty, commitment and trust by
providing them better quality services. Service
quality has become a competitive strategy in the Indian banking sector. Thus, it is
important to explore service quality and its effect
on customer loyalty, commitment and trust in public and private sector banks.
Another related objective is to examine the differences between public and
private banks with regard to these factors. A
brief literature review is done to examine the existing literature and then the gap
is identified to formulate objectives and research questions. |