Darwin defined a moral being as “one who
is capable of comparing his past and future
actions or motives, and of approving or
disapproving them” (Barrett and Freeman,
1988). He also rated the moral
competence as higher than any other
intellectual faculty. Kohlberg (1964)
extended the definition to describe a
morally competent person as “one who
has the capacity to make decisions and
judgments which are moral (i.e., based
on one’s internal principles), and to act
in accordance with such judgments.”
Oscar Arias, Former president of Costa
Rica, Winner of 1987 Nobel Peace Prize,
said that “in the 21st century, survival will
be a more complicated and precarious
question than ever before, and the ethics
required of us must be correspondingly
sophisticated” (Kiddler and Shiela, 2004).
There was, there is, and there will always
be an acknowledgment of the value of
morals as an integral part of the social
systems.
Strengthening its moral competence is
thus one of the top priorities of the
contemporary society. There are several
entry points offered by the current
sociological systems where there is a
possibility to educate people on what is
moral competence and how it can be
developed. Two significant entry points
would be the industrial organizations and
academic institutions. Industrial
organizations, as progressors of society,
often try to build moral competence by
bringing in a code-of-ethics that could
guide the behavior and decision-making
of employees at all levels. While that is
one side of the story, this phenomenon
inherently assumes that employees already have the willingness and the necessary
competence to follow and use the codeof-
ethics. Corporate governance could
perhaps be a more inclusive word here for
the industrial organizations. On the other
hand, academic institutions, as building
blocks of the society, teach and train the
younger generations to mold them not
only to be more productive, but also to be
more morally competent.
|