Risk
management architecture in the financial sector has
acquired paramount significance due to the increasing
volumes and complexities of financial transactions.
The banking sector, in particular, being highly leveraged
and bearing fiduciary responsibility, is the most
vulnerable to ever-expanding sources of potential
risks. Surging volumes and a 360-degree integration
in the financial sector have rendered the traditional
methods of monitoring and managing risks useless.
This has led to a global statistical revolution in
risk management techniques over the past decade or
so.
Increasingly, financial firms are relying on statistical
models to measure and manage financial risks; ranging
from market risks (such as, interest rate or exchange
rate fluctuations), credit risks (such as, borrowers'
default probabilities) to operational risks (such
as, expected losses due to fraudulent transactions
or system failures). Such models have gained credibility
as they provide a coherent framework for identifying,
analyzing and managing these risks.
However,
most of such models are only stimulations of reality
and cannot capture every aspect of these risks. Since,
most fundamental basis of almost all quantitative
models is `probability', such models constructed to
monitor typical risk outcomes tend to focus on most
probable events and do not capture the unlikely yet
plausible events that could cause losses. |