Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Brand Management :
The Concept and Origin of Brand Architecture: A Comprehensive Literature Survey
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Brand architecture is comparatively a new concept. This terminology was used for the first time in 1995. In essence, it refers to an organization's approach to the design and management of its brand portfolio—decisions regarding number of brands, role of specific brands and relationships among the brands. This paper presents a comprehensive literature survey on the pioneering work done on this subject by renowned researchers and academicians. Brand architecture plays a very important role in the management of a large product portfolio, but this is perhaps often not consciously recognized. More research could throw fresh light on its application.

 
 
 

Brand architecture refers to the structuring and organization of a company's product/brand portfolio—naming, positioning and marketing of the products. It establishes a hierarchical relationship among a company's brands. While brand portfolio refers to the actual basket of brands of a company, brand architecture determines how the brands are mutually related. Depending on business needs, the individual brands in the brand portfolio may be added, deleted or extended to new categories. But the brand architecture would remain comparatively unchanged for long periods and would serve as a guiding framework for brand portfolio management.

The first possibility is that all products/services of the company carry the same brand name, usually that of the company/organization itself. For example, all products/services of IBM carry the company name and there are no distinct brand names for individual products/services.The second approach would be to have endorsed branding strategy. Here, the products carry a dual brand name—a specific brand name for the product to aid unique identification and positioning, preceded by the company name for indicating the source and authenticity of the product. Nestle KitKat, for example, would fall under this category.

The third method is to have independent brand names for each of the products, with no reference to the source/company. Unilever and Procter & Gamble are classic examples of companies that follow this kind of a branding framework. Here, each brand has its own distinct identity and are marketed with their own unique positioning. This model offers two distinct advantages. The company can have multiple brands in the same product category—catering to different segments. Any negative downturn of an individual brand does not directly affect the company's image. The principal disadvantage is that a much larger budget would be required to build and support several brands with distinct identities and positioning.

 
 
 

Brand Architecture, Comprehensive Literature Survey, Product portfolio, Brand portfolio management, Hierarchical relationship, Branding strategies, Branding frameworks, Corporate brand structures, Brand Organizations, Strategic Brand Management.