|
The empirical literature on the determinants of hedging has overwhelmingly focused
on advanced economies. Distinct reasons have been advanced to encourage firms to
hedge, such as the financial distress costs, underinvestment hypothesis, convexity of tax
structure and others. However, to date, no work has been entertained in this field for a
developing country.
An insight into how Mauritian firms really hedge their foreign exchange risk
becomes a sine qua non. First, local firms can resort to forwards which are provided by
local commercial banks. The benefit attached to forward contracts is that they do not
require any initial or maintenance margin account. Another cost-saving advantage is that the
fees or commissions applied are low since the bank is providing a whole set of facilities
such as overdraft, documentary credit, bank guarantees and loans. Second, practitioners
are conversant with the fact that the rupee has consistently been depreciating against the
US dollar, euro and pound sterling. Subsequently, for an exporter, the need to hedge
its receipts, denominated in any of the above three foreign currencies, is not warranted.
This new research is geared towards assessing the determinants of hedging
in Mauritius. The analysis is extensive as it caters to listed and unlisted firms and the
top 100 companies in terms of growth and turnover, respectively. Besides, the research
is interesting in the sense that it delves into the decision to hedge of an
upper-income developing country, empirical evidence of which is scarce or practically nonexistent. |