Today, soft skills figure prominently in syllabi across the educational spectrum. From
undergraduate curricula to B-School programs, from elitist high school time tables to
vocational training center schedules, soft skills training scores high on educators’ and
recruiters’ agenda alike. Soft skills modules are interwoven, often, with language
curricula or placement programs. Short-term training sessions are planned, experts are
hired, in-house faculty is trained, reading lists are drawn up, libraries are stocked, online
resources are located and increasingly, of late, outbound training camps are arranged.
In short, no stone is left unturned in an effort to give trainees the best in globally relevant
soft skills in order to enhance their employability quotient. This agenda, if left
unfinished in any way, is completed by training departments of the employing
companies.
However, in our quest to impart these all-important skills among our youth, are we
forgetting one highly significant factor—that of our cultural context which varies greatly
from the context from which we often borrow our training material? Are we inadvertently
opening up our cultural space to outside influences without thinking about the longterm
consequences of such actions?
|