Performance management is a broad term coined by Aubrey Daniels in the late 1970s to
describe a technology (i.e., science imbedded in applications methods) for managing both
behavior and results—two critical elements of what is known as performance. It may be possible
to get all professionals reconcile their personal goals with the organizational goals and increase
productivity and profitability of an organization using this process. It can be applied by
organizations or a single department or a section inside an organization, as well as by an
individual. The performance process is appropriately named ‘self-propelled performance
process’. Managing employee or system performance facilitates effective delivery of strategic
and operational goals. There is a clear and immediate correlation between using performance
management programs and improved business and organizational results.
There are basically two methods of performance appraisal, viz., traditional and modern.
The traditional methods basically include essay appraisal method, straight ranking method,
paired comparisons, critical incidents, field review, graphic rating, and forced distribution. The modern methods of performance appraisal system include behavioral anchored rating scales,
human resource accounting methods, 360 degree performance appraisal method, and
management by objective method. The main focus of the paper is on assessing the awareness
of banking professionals regarding evaluation criteria and the factors responsible for the same,
and the magnitude of the effect of such methods on their jobs and performance.
|