IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of English Studies :
Prospero’s Chimera of Indulgence: The Subaltern in Shakespeare’s The Tempest
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper seeks to study Prospero’s wish-fulfilling fantasy as the monarch of all he surveys with none to dispute his right, accomplished through the services of Ariel and Caliban. Prospero is charged with a colonial spirit aggravated and strengthened by his deep study of magic used adeptly, to make his slaves perform sundry tasks—from domestic chores to avenging his enemies. The chimera of Prospero’s spectacular vision comes alive at the cost of bondage of the subalterns—Ariel and Caliban—bringing fruitful results to the wizard. Master’s severe mental/physical tortures and acrimonious treatment form the subalterns’ saga in The Tempest. To accomplish the heuristic activities of his mind, Prospero enforced enormous tasks on Ariel and Caliban, threatening them with severe punishment and everlasting confinement if they failed. Protest by these two victims, who facilitated the realization of all Prospero’s fantasies, from creating the magic tempest at the outset till the final errand is served, is suppressed with strict temper and icy conscience. The paper addresses the psychological and political combat of colonial master and his slaves spelling out how the imbalance of power between them fulfills Prospero’s fantasy, reflecting the politics of power as well as the mental setup and attitude of both the oppressor and the oppressed, having involved the audience in the act of witnessing the play. The paper focuses on the growth and development of the situation that ultimately makes Prospero arrive at the point of renunciation of magicwand seeking refuge in forgiveness and reconciliation.

 
 
 

Colonialism brought with it the destruction of traditional societies, the denigration of indigenous identities and economic exploitation. In the opinion of Leela Gandhi, “Colonialism... marks the historical process whereby the ‘West’ attempts systematically to cancel or negate the cultural difference and value of the ‘non-West’” (Genetsch, 2007, p. 12).

With the advent of postcolonialism, those formerly oppressed have tried to recover an idea of their respected histories, languages and traditions. In order to achieve this aim, the crippling images imposed on the native people by the colonizers had to be destroyed first. The core concern of the theory was to challenge the image of the colonial subject where they were always represented as the Other. As Said contended in Orientalism, the West has not only conquered the East politically but also appropriated the Orient’s languages, history and culture for themselves. Said (1978, p. 204) puts it thus: “My contention is that Orientalism is fundamentally a political doctrine willed over the Orient because the Orient was weaker than the West, which elided the Orient’s difference with its weakness.... As a cultural apparatus Orientalism is all aggression, activity, judgment, will-to-truth and knowledge.”

 
 
 

English Studies Journal, Postcolonial literatures, Subaltern, Prospero’s Chimera, Indulgence, The Subaltern, Shakespeare’s, Ariel and Caliban. Prospero, Orientalism, The Tempest.