The behavior of stock market volatility, its causes and effects have long been a subject of
extensive theoretical and empirical research. Three factors are primarily responsible for such
emphasis. First, volatility of returns has a paramount importance in asset pricing. Second,
market crashes at various times renew the issue of effects of volatility shocks. Many market
practitioners and researchers attribute the actions of informed participants like institutional
investors and corporate insiders as the foremost cause for surge in stock market volatility.
Thus, modeling and incorporating volatility forecasts become indispensable in asset valuation
and implementation of investment strategies. Third, leaving out volatility in analyzing other
market variables may lead to spurious references (Morgan and Morgan, 1987; Connolly,
1989; and Kryzanowski and Zhang, 1996).
The relationship between foreign institutional ownership and volatility is largely
inconclusive. Contemporaneous nature of FII flows and stock market volatility, especially at
times of economic crisis, prompts the popular press to attribute the former as an enhancer of
the latter. The requirement of a clear understanding of stock market volatility in emerging
economies stems from three aspects. First, a higher equity return volatility increases the cost
of equity capital. Second, asset pricing and investment strategies need to factor in the
relationship between priced-risk and return volatility. And third, higher volatility often
increases the “option to wait” and therefore delays investments (Bekaert and Harvey, 1995).
Also, empirical regularities in the behavior of volatility are extremely vital and decisive in
the pricing of options under stochastic volatility option pricing models.
|