The question that seems to be
arising often in general Hu-
man Resource (HR) leadership is, "Why should branding
be important to me? I work in HR, not marketing." It is important to
see what brand means in business. Ideally, a brand is a product, service
or concept, visibly distinguished from its competitor, enabling it to
communicate efficiently, and helping in establishing a unique identity in
the eyes of the public. The philosophy behind HR branding comes
from the very basic of the expression. HR is a service department and thus,
always it is difficult to count its performance in numbers. However,
the value proposition of HR in organizational effectiveness is
unquestionable. The HR function is the `face' of the organization. Employees
base their perception about the organization, largely, on the
experience that they have of HR right from beginning of recruitment till
post- employment dues settlement. Nevertheless, in spite of just
being looked as a support function, HR today is viewed as a key player
in driving customer satisfaction and thus, entails corporate
success. Thus, it becomes imperative for HR to have its own branding, so that
it could continue to protect the strategic interest of the firm and
sustain the support so as to achieve the corporate objective. In practice,
HR branding is regarded as the subset of employer branding, which
in turn, is also regarded as a subset of corporate branding initiatives of
the organization. The organization's HR branding initiatives are largely
internally focused, meant for the employees within the fold of the
organization, whereas bigger employer branding initiatives are
externally focused largely meant for the employees in waiting. The role of
HR branding primarily aims at retaining the talent, whereas the
employer branding works for acquisition of the talent.
A "software major" with almost three decades of operational
experience behind it is working on an end-to-end project of its client
with huge capital investment. In order to protect the goods and property,
the company hired the services of a security agency. The client
organization suddenly receives a complaint regarding non-disbursement of
salary to the security guard employed by the agency. The
client organization's HR rushed to the site to check the cause. On
discussing with the Project-in-Charge of the software company, it is learnt
that the company is unaware of the recent increase of the
minimum wages, so it is not possible for them to settle the increased claim of
security agency and as a repercussion, the agency is also unable to
release the payment. The software major is, however, pronouncing its
world- class HR practice. |