In
times of an increasingly unifying European Union (EU), diminishing
barriers and the pursuit of an overall European harmonization,
research on questions concerning European capital market
integration has been intensified during the past decade.
Researchers take different perspectives in order to test
the European capital markets for their degree of integration.
Since the late 1990s, investigations focusing on either
the real capital market integration like De Ménil
(1999), the role of financial intermediaries (Buch, 1999),
or the capital market interdependence (Pentecost and Holmes,
1995; Moosa and Bhatti, 1996) come to a conclusion that
the integration of Europe's financial markets is in progress,
but still far from completion.
Oh (2003) provides supporting
evidence on widely segmented European capital markets. By
means of the formal approval of the European Takeover Directive
in 2004, EU politics finally established a universally valid
framework with the aim of advancing corporate restructuring
and capital market integration. Against this background,
it seems worth examining, what conclusions can be presently
drawn with regard to European capital market integration.
We
refer to the prevalent hypotheses in literature here which
postulating that differences in shareholder wealth creation
between cross-border and national takeovers might only emerge
in the event of market imperfectionssuch as occurring in
nationally segmented capital markets. In the case of highly
integrated financial markets, wealth creation differences
between domestic and transnational takeovers are not expected. |