Dianne Meredith (1999) rightly observes that poets have a penchant for
"stretching descriptions of a regional landscape beyond the confines of the purely objective
reality" (p. 126); in a way, they attempt to evolve the character of the place. At the same
time, there must be poets like Wallace Stevens who muse, objectively, on the
place's instrumentality in evolving the character of the people living in that place. In both
these cases, the activity of perception is very important, and perception is impossible
without imagination. In fact, imagination is the fundamental source of all knowledge. Did not,
for example, Newton, first of all `imagine' that the earth must have some force or power
that attracts? Would not falsifying the imaginary perception be falsifying the truth
itself? Perceptions of a place, therefore, can be used to study territorial identity or, what
Knight (1982) ambiguously calls, "geographies of the mind" (p. 517). Interpretations of
man's identity are thus a matter of investigation of both place and its perceptions.
Therefore, Corcoran (1986) says that American whites, in their attempt to establish an identity
distinct from their European inheritance, charged themselves with a pioneering spirit that
looked "outwards and upwards, to fulfillment through movement, advance, exploration" (p.
62). In this sense, Stevens is a modern American pioneer, but he does not reflect as
much concern for a specifically American identity as for the `way' the self, identity, or
character is created.
Like Lacan, Stevens recognized the importance, vastness, and complexity of the field
of images and activities of the imagination; both realized the importance of what Lacan
calls the "formative value" of the image
(Lacan, 1993, p. 165). The poet was also
constantly aware that the external world is an inevitable part of images; that, in fact, the external
world provides images, which build the general character of a person or the people living in
a particular geographical environment. |