The study of relationship between molecular structure and molecular function
or reactivity of the substances (particularly of the organic compounds) is integral
to chemistry. According to similar property principle (Johnson and Maggiora, 1990),
"the structurally similar molecules tend to have similar properties and similar
molecules exert similar biological activities". Medicinal chemists have made use of this
concept to modify the structures of biologically active compounds. However, similarity
and diversity of chemical structures cannot be defined in an objective manner. Several
structure-activity relationship studies demonstrate that chemically similar
compounds may have significantly different biological actions and activities (Hansch et al., 1990; Dean, 1995; Wolff, 1995; and Wermuth, 1996). Sometimes, similar organic
structured molecules may even have opposite function or activity.
Interesting example of structure-activity relationships and irrelation can
be found in two classes of compounds responsible for the sensation that are
normally associated with pungent and pleasant flavor. The structures of all the
four substances written below look remarkably similar. Each contains an aromatic
ring with two ortho oxygen in ether-phenol combination. In the compound
capsaicin and zingerone long chain at fourth position contains a >CO group in the
same position but capsaicin is an amide and zingerone is a ketone. In the
substances vanillin and eugenol bond to the ring at position
four is not a long chain like in the substances. The vanallin contains aldehyde group at
four positions. Eugenol contains
–CH2–CH=CH2. Both the compounds give pleasant flavor in the
mouth which may be associated with the activation of the cool receptors. Therefore
slight change in the structure of organic compounds changes the behavior of the
chemical substances. Herein, is described the investigation of the chemical similarity
of capsaicin, zingerone, vanillin and eugenol using Tanimoto
Coefficient (TC) and Euclidean Distance (ED) methods (Flower, 1998; Willett et al., 1998; and Oliver, 2008). The TC is directly dependent upon the number of bits in common.
The presence of common molecular features increases the value of
TC. But ED effectively regards a common absence of feature as evidence of similarity.
A consequence of this difference is that small molecules have lower
similarity values when using TC. Smaller molecules can appear to be closer together
when using the ED, which does take into account the absence of common features
(Willett et al., 1998). |