Use of several augmentative methods for enhancement of heat and mass
transfer rates is ubiquitous in process and manufacturing industries. The augmentation
in heat and mass transfer rates results in the
reduction of the size of operating equipment, often with improved performance. This indeed lessens the burden
of capital to be invested. The various methods employed for achieving
augmentation of heat and mass transfer rates have been summarized by Bergles (1998).
Broadly these methods are classified as: passive enhancement techniques, active
enhancement techniques and compound enhancement techniques. Passive techniques do not
require any external power. Active techniques need the application of
external power. Simultaneous application of two or
more techniques is called as compound enhancement technique. Use of treated surfaces,
rough surfaces, extended surfaces, displaced devices, swirl flow devices, coiled tubes,
surface tension devices etc., come under passive enhancement techniques. Using
mechanical aids, surface vibration, fluid vibration, electrostatic fields, suction, injection and
additives for fluids form the active enhancement techniques. Detailed information on all
these techniques is presented by Bergles (1998). A good review of passive
enhancement methods was also provided by Dewan et
al. (2004). In general, passive methods are preferred to active methods for better cost-effectiveness. Among all the
passive methods, the technique of employing displaced devices is widely in use.
A comprehensive review on employing twisted tapes and coiled wires as
heat transfer enhancement devices was presented by Dewan et al. (2004).
Enhancement of mass transfer rates was investigated by employing
displaced promoters such as crossflow elements (Bhaskara Sarma et al., 1986), coiled wires (Rajendra Prasad et al., 2004), string of spheres (Sitaraman, 1977), string of
cones (Sarveswara Rao and Raju, 1986), string of discs (Venkateswarlu et al., 2000) and helical tape on a rod (Sujatha et al., 1997). In all these investigations, the
mass transfer between the column wall and the flowing liquid electrolyte was
measured by a limiting current technique. The limiting current technique was first
employed by Lin et al. (1951) for the measurement of mass transfer coefficient between
an annular rod and flowing electrolyte. |