How regionalization is explained, interpreted or evaluated depends mainly on
the definition of the concept. The dominant contemporary theoretical
approach, referred to as the New Regionalism Approach (NRA) is a broad,
all-inclusive, multidimensional approach, covering all disciplines and all interstate
activities. Under the NRA, therefore, "integration is conceptualized as a multidimensional
and socially constructed phenomenon, wherein cooperation occurs across
economic, political, security, environment and other issues. It involves not only state
actors but also private industry and civil
society". Important to note from this
NRA definition is that regional integration may or may not involve the nation
state; implying, therefore that sub-state level interaction across national borders
also qualify as regional integration.
The so-called `old regionalism' awards a central position to the nation state:
the nation state, according to this approach, must undergo a metamorphosis in
order to become part, to a greater or lesser degree, of a larger entity, referred to by
Phillipe Schmitter as a Transnational Regional Organization (TRO). Only when the TRO
evolves into a Trans-Regional Polity (TRP), "acquiring some legitimate capacity
(however limited) to act on its own by initiating proposals, making decisions,
and/or implementing policies, only then the regionalism can be said to switch
from cooperation to integration". In essence, statecentrism must be superseded
by supranationalism. In terms of the Schmitter definition, therefore, integrative
processes in Africa, and for that matter most, if not all, TROs outside the European
Union context, are yet to progress from cooperation to integration.
Of course, bearing in mind that integration is a variable condition rather
than a fixed concept, and that there is no generally accepted or essentialist definition
of the concept, the various approaches to recanalization do not stand in a
zero-sum relationship. By including a complexity of variables in its theoretical arsenal,
the multidimensional focus of NRA adds to the better understanding of the
complexities of integration phenomenon. But, at the same time, care must be taken to avoid
a veritable theoretical supermarket approach where `everything is related to
everything else'. Relevance and congruency are important attributes of any political theory
and the question is how these theoretical approaches, separately or combined, could
be synthesized into a useful analytical instrument to explain the uniqueness of
African integration. Theory should add to understanding, explaining, and prediction
of reality. As stated by Cox, "theory .... follows reality in the sense that it is
shaped by reality. But it also precedes the making of reality in the sense that it orients
the minds of those who by their actions reproduce or change that
reality." So, perhaps, one should not be too fastidious about the terms `old regionalism' and
`new regionalism' bearing in mind the Chinese proverb that it does not really
matter whether the cat is white or black as long as it can catch mice! |