IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Applied Finance
Financial Liberalization and Services Sector Growth: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper focuses on the relationship between financial liberalization and services sector growth in Pakistan, capturing the impact of financial liberalization using the Financial Liberalization Index (FLI) first developed by Hye and Wizarat (2010). The results suggest that in the short run both FLI and the real interest rate (RIR) positively impact the services sector growth, but in the long run, FLI and RIR are negatively related to services sector growth.

 
 
 

Services sector in Pakistan includes transportation, storage, communication, wholesale and retail trade, finance and insurance, ownership of dwellings, public administration and defense, community services, etc. Due to the growing volume of services sector in the economic growth of Pakistan, several changes have been made to enhance its role in overall growth. The liberalization of financial services, mainly insurance, banking and market securities in the 1990s, is among the many steps taken by Pakistan for the development of this sector. The services sector is believed to be the most affected by the financial liberalization process, because it has long been dominated by the industrial and agriculture sectors in Pakistan. The recent reforms in this sector include privatization of state-owned banks and insurance companies, opening up of the stock market to foreign investors under the Private Investment Act, 1976, prudential regulations and interest rate deregulation.

In order to be sustainable, the services sector growth must be accompanied by a proportionate growth of the commodity producing sectors. The object of this study is to evaluate the correlation between financial liberalization and services sector growth in Pakistan's economy.

Three types of theoretical views are available in the literature of finance and growth. First, finance is most crucial for economic growth (Schumpeter, 1911; Goldsmith, 1969; Hicks, 1969; McKinnon and Shaw, 1973; Romer, 1986; Barro, 1991; Japelli and Pagano, 1994; and Levine, 1997). The second view states that finance is relatively less important for economic growth (Robinson, 1952; Lewis, 1955; and Lucas, 1988). The third view argues that financial development impedes economic growth (Van, 1982; Buffie, 1984; and Stiglitz, 1994).

 
 
 

Applied Finance Journal, Financial Liberalization, Services Sector in Pakistan, Stock Market, Financial Development, Gross Domestic Product, GDP, Economic Growth, Stock Market Reforms, Debt Management Reforms, Policy Implications, Credit Rationing System, Banking Assets.