Advertising
in the modern sense is the art of enticement and allure.
The choice of words, images and colors play an important
role in persuading people to purchase a particular
product. Prominently, it is the special use of language
in certain advertisements that makes people instantly
relate to the products. In fact, advertising depends
heavily on the use of language, which is a meaning
making process, in other words, it depends on `semantics'.
Of
all the domains of linguistics, semantics or the study
of meaning has been `the most engrossing, controversial
and often tricky' (Prakasam, Anvita: 1986). The application
of semantic theories to analyze advertisements has
taken precedence in recent times. Though, semantic
theories in vogue are mostly western concepts, a look
at our literary tradition shows that Sanskrit grammarians,
Panini, Katyayana, Patanjali and Bhartrhari developed
semantic theories that were more critical.
In
the Indian (Sanskrit) tradition there are two main
approaches to the study of meaning: The Khandapaksha
and the Akhandapaksha. The Khandapaksha approach was
more analytical, which advocated that the `word' is
the `autonomous use of thought and sense, and the
sentence is taken as the concatenation of words' (ibid).
Grammarians, Panini, Katyayana, Patanjali and Bhartrhari
took the `word' as the `point of origin' for semantic
study. The Akandapaksha approach, advocated by Bhartrhari,
treated sentence as `a single, integral symbol.' |