In an era of cut-throat
competition with organizations
striving to achieve excellence, it has become a must for
any organization to create a niche in the competing market space.
Most successful organizations possess the niche in the form of
competitive advantage through its human resources across the swath of
the value chain of its business. The talent bank of an
organization determines its competitive scope in the arena. Organizations
are spending enormous amounts in the form of recruitment, training,
and employee maintenance to acquire and sustain human talents. Thus,
it becomes a daunting task for the strategic thinkers: the top
level executives to retain and nurture the talents available in
their organizations to gain a competitive advantage.
One of the major concerns of an organization is retaining
its employees. The situation becomes still more turbulent when top
level executives; highly skilled employees; and star performers
quit the organization, as the replacement of those
employees becomes a daunting task for the human resource professionals.
The common approach in finding the reasons for the
employees' departure in an organization is through `exit interviews'. An
exit interview records the reasons for the quitting of employees.
The question is about the reliability of the exit interview in collating
the right reasons for the employees quitting and to determine if it is
a valid approach?
This article questions about the validity of the exit interview
in recording the `employee turnover' reasons and also discusses
the problems that it inherits. Before starting on a discussion on the
issues of the exit interview, let us first get acquainted with employee
turnover, its type and consequences. |