Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which started voluntarily in some companies, caught on with the corporate
world over the last few decades. CSR became a norm as per few countries'
corporate governance codes. Many other countries are also contemplating
inclusion of CSR initiatives as a standard corporate governance practice. It has
become a competitive necessity rather than a nicety, which it used to be.
Companies saw the benefit. Shareholders supported the initiatives.
Stakeholders appreciated the initiatives. However, as Adam Smith observed, "It
is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker,
that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest.
We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and
never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages." The
intriguing question however is, why should a retailer support CSR blowing up
millions of pounds. After all, it is not manufacturing anything to justify
the shareholders' money allocated for CSR initiatives. This case study
illustrates the issue with Tesco, UK's top retailer.
Corporate scandals at Enron, WorldCom and others made
people distrust big businesses and this increased government regulations.
This apart, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) started criticizing
and battling with multinational companies. The trend of rankings and
ratings also pressurized companies to report their non-financial performance
along with financial results. And, of late, media is observing companies
closely. Embarrassing news anywhere in the worldsay, a child sewing a cloth
with a company's brand on itcan be broadcasted across the world
instantly. Relatively, customers are increasingly concerned about the
companies' impact on society including that on the physical environment,
impact of products on the consumers, etc., as customers have become
more aware of these issues through mass media. |