Unprecedented technological advances, unparalled diversity, winds of rapid
change, innovation in products and designs, escalating strategic and operational
competition, cultural and ethical dilemmas, employee exodus and growing unrest by
stakeholders for greater productivity, rising performance demands, etc., are spurring
organizational leaders and managers to think how to structure organizations to better respond to
this reality, and survive ultimately.
In turbulent times, an enterprise has to be managed both to withstand sudden
blows and avail itself of unexpected opportunities. It is not an either or proposition, but
rather a paradoxical situation which must be confronted by organizations and its
leadership and followers. This means that in turbulent times the fundamentals have to be
managed, and managed, well (Drucker, 1980).
Skeptical leaders may be wondering—is it really worth it? Why to bother during
these turbulent times? Would it not be far easier to just call it a day, or start all over, or
blow up the structure, or simply give up trying to use the organizational structure as a
strategic asset at all? Against the backdrop of such challenges one must recall how great
leaders like Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Abraham Lincoln have changed the course of
history with tremendous vision and courage without placing an emphasis on
organizational structure to support their efforts. However, when it comes to business, it is
cautioned to replicate the same logic because organizations are dealing metaphorically with an
animal of a far different shape, complexity, and the dynamic forces at work in the industry
require unity of purpose. Organizations, thus enable people working in groups to
accomplish goals that none of them could do on their own. In this way, they are able to
harness complex and simple technologies and ingenious solutions to achieve greatness in a
far more profound and sustainable fashion (Mitroff, 2004). |