Kim & Mauborgne
(2005) have suggested that the stra-
tegic move, not the company, be used as a unit of analy
sis for determining future profitability, and they have
recommended a framework for ensuring sustained
profitability through the creation of uncontested market space.
However, analyzing strategic moves is essentially a post facto exercise
and is therefore of historical rather than prescriptive
significance. This article suggests that since strategic moves are made by
the company's leaders, it would be more appropriate to consider
leadership and not the company or the strategic move as an indicator
of sustained competitive advantage. This is because a strategic move is
a conscious decision of the leadership, whatever framework they use (or
do not use) for making that decision. Even though the choice of a
particular leader does not guarantee the right strategic move all the time,
it does provide cues to the future profitability of a company.
This article analyzes the strategies of Apple under the leadership
of Steve Jobs, and discusses the latest announcement of the company -
the Apple iPad. The article concludes that it would be erroneous to
compare the iPad with existing mobile computing devices and pronounce
it as deficient. It is not a laptop equivalent, but a device aimed at
cloud computing - the future shape of computing. It also suggests that
although "content", in the form of
supporting software, is very important for the high-tech industry, there is
another dimension to content - creativity.
With increased internet penetration and the widespread use of
computers for non-business purposes, a creative dimension enters into
the picture so that an MP3 file or an online game is not just a
computer code, but music or entertainment. As the industry moves towards
convergence, this dimension assumes greater complexity, and with
it, greater differentiative significance. Apple, under Steve Jobs, has
repeatedly demonstrated superiority over others in this dimension, as
evidenced by the success of products like iPod and iPhone. Rivals such
as Microsoft and Sony, though giants in their respective fields,
have struggled lately on this dimension. As a result, their products have
not been able to effectively compete with those of Apple. |