This paper discusses two issues of project managementproject finance and credit rationing. It tries to gain a better understanding of project finance and explains it in terms of a risk strategy that reconciles the potentially conflicting objectives of borrowers and lenders. This is done through discussion of the concept of the community of interests that exist in the commercial and industrial linkages between the various parties involved in a project.
In
2002, new private commercial bank lending worth approximately
US$80 bn went on project financing. During the same
year the World Bank made loan disbursements totaling
US$27.1 bn. This suggests that new project financing
in the private and public sectors, even excluding
the World's various regional development banks and
private placement markets, was much more than has
been thought.
Despite
the size and importance of the market, there is still
not much focus and importance attached to project
finance and there is no precise definition, which
adequately explains it. Where there exists a definition,
project finance is not a precise concept and, in particular,
there are no theories of project finance. Most studies
have simply helped to popularize the subject without
fully explaining it or focused on the descriptive
aspect and emphasized the `mechanics' of project finance
rather than attempting a serious theoretical exposition
of the subject. As a consequence there are no obvious
structures in any of the research studies, which explain
project finance in terms of a risk strategy that reconciles
the divergent objectives of borrowers and lenders.
Wynant's
study [1977]1 came close to a tentative
general theory of project finance because it did attempt
to analyze the effects of project finance on the debt-raising
capacity of the firm, but it assumed that all forms
of financing which were off-balance sheet were synonymous
with project finance. This popular conception may
also have resulted in some disinformation about the
real phenomenon of risk in project finance. In particular,
literature definitions seem inconsistent with each
other, being either too narrowly modeled on the principles
of `pure non-recourse' and `off-balance sheet' financing
or too unbounded in their reference to diverse capital
and money markets as sources of finance for industrial
investment. |