Hats
off to Maruti! True, to the much-hyped road shows and
publicity campaigns, the IPO of the Indian automobile
giant (the first ever PSU to be divested by the Government
of India through the market route instead of a strategic
sale) received an overwhelming response, both from institutional
investors and retail investors. The Government as a
result of this exercise would divest 25% of its stake
in Maruti. Keeping in view the oversubscription (of
nearly 10 times) to the issue, the Government further
decided to retain 10% of this oversubscription, by means
of exercising the green-shoe option. This implies that
henceforth the Government equity in Maruti would come
down to about 17% from 45%, which, the Government has
an option to divest within a year either by selling
it entirely to the Suzuki Corporation, its joint venture
partner or via the market. The Government had approved
a cutoff price of Rs. 125 per share, which is Rs. 10
higher than the floor price of Rs. 115 per share. On
the listing day (July 12, 2003), Maruti's shares were
quoted at around Rs. 170 per share, which is inline
with the market expectations of quoting above the Government
approved price.
Even
though it is the institutional investors who have led
the race for a pie in Maruti on the first day of opening
of the issue (June 12, 2003), in the real sense, it
was the retail investors who have stolen the show all
the way through the offer until it was closed on June
19th. As a reward to their enthusiastic participation,
the Government has decided to allocate nearly 60% of
the total 79 million shares to retail investors and
the remaining 40% to Qualified Institutional Investors
(QIIs). This indeed, is against the Sebi's norms for
allocation of shares issued through book-building process,
which states that any unlisted company coming for an
IPO through a complete bookbuilding process should allocate
60% of the total shares issued to QIIs and the rest
to the retail investors. The move by the Government
then, to allocate 60% of the total shares issued to
the retail investors should not be perceived as a violation
of Sebi's norms, but as a measure to regain the retail
trust in the primary markets. Two questions immediately
crop up and in fact, they have already become debatable
among analysts who are following the entire Maruti IPO
saga with keen interest. |