Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The Analyst Magazine:
GM-Renault-Nissan : Will it Work?
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The proposed three-way, three-continental strategic alliance among GM, Renault, and Nissan offers too few synergies to make it work for them. In early July, a proposal from Kirk Kerkorian, one of the largest share-holders of General Motors (GM), took the entire global auto industry by surprise. Kerkorian, who holds 10% shares of the company, had proposed a three-way alliance among American giant GM, France-based Renault, and Japans Nissan. Two weeks later, in mid-July, the three companies have issued a joint statement that they are willing to review the proposal. According to reports, the companies will conduct a 90-day review of the potential benefits and possible synergies that can be derived from the alliance.

GM, the world's largest car maker by volume, has been in deep financial crisis for more than a decade, owing to burgeoning labor costs and dwindling market share. Although its embattled Chairman, Rick Wagoner, has taken severe cost-cutting measures, it could be of little help to save the companylast year it posted a net loss of $10 bn and its sales dropped by 12%. On the other hand, Renault is Europe's most profitable mass market car maker and its market capital is almost double that of GM while Nissan is now Japan's second largest and the world's most profitable car manufacturer by margins. The two companies are eyeing a 20% stake in GM. Given their financial positions, it may not be difficult for them to afford it (it will cost them around $3 bn), but s opine that the companies should cautiously weigh the pros and cons; else it could prove disastrous, as with other alliances in the past.

In the past decade, there have been many attempts in the global auto industry to consolidate, but most of them met with failures. Two unprofitable firms, Jaguar and Saab, were acquired by Ford and GM respectively only to result in further losses. Another merger, between Daimler-Benz and Chrysler, that was portrayed as a merger between equals, took six years to bring both of them on equal kneel. GM itself has faced similar situations during the mid-1990s when it bought small stakes in Asian and European firms with an intention to build a GM federation for greater market share.

 
 
 

GM-Renault-Nissan : Will it Work?,global auto industry,American giant GM, France-based Renault,Japan s Nissan,potential benefits,strategic alliance, global car industry,global market,profitable mass market,market capital,
financial positions,economies of scale,technology,global developments, Indian market,Mahindra & Mahindra,Maruti-Suzuki,global footprint,Product rationalization,cost savings,geographical reach.