Stock market integration has several managerial implications, particularly to the investors
and policy makers. A number of studies have examined the interrelationship between the
stock indices in the global stock market, especially among stock indices across the developed
countries (Kasa, 1992; Chung and Liu, 1994; Corhay et al., 1995; and Kanas, 1998). Other studies
have also linked the interdependencies of stock markets of developed nations to those of
Asian countries (Chung and Liu, 1994; and Masih and Masih, 1998). Indeed, due to the high
growth rates recorded by East Asian economies in the past, scholars have diverted their attention
in examining the integration of Asian stock markets (Masih and Masih, 1999, 2001 and
2002; Bilson et al., 2000; Roca and Selvanathan, 2001; and Ratnapakorn and Sharma, 2002).
However, studies linking the stock interdependencies between the Newly Industrialized Economies
(NIEs) and the emerging South-East Asian market, Malaysia are limited. This study aims to examine
the Malaysia's stock market integration with those of NIEs, during the period 2001-2006. In
addition, Japan was included in this study because of its increasing role in influencing the stock
markets of Asia.
First, the paper focuses on examining the interdependencies of stock markets of
Malaysia with those of Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Japan. It is found that after the
Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, many of these countries have taken steps to liberalize their
financial sectors. Theoretically, the process of financial liberalization should give rise to a more
integrated market among countries. As a consequence of deregulation and
liberalization, investor's opportunity to invest abroad widens between these markets. Bilson et al. (2000) found that regional integration among stock markets in Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan
and Thailand is much faster than their integration with the global markets. A focused analysis on
the Malaysian markets and the NIEs is warranted not only because they share the same
financial crisis history, but because these countries are also important intraregional trading partners
with close regional economic cooperation. |