Data collected from 877 respondents had a 58% response
rate, using anonymously completed questionnaires. Engagement
was assessed by three scales developed by Schaufeli, Salanova,
Gonzalez-Roma, and Bakker (2002) to assess vigor, dedication
and absorption. Antecedents included personal demographic
and work situation characteristics as well as measures of
need for achievement and workaholic behaviors; consequences
included measures of work satisfaction and psychological
well-being.
The following results were observed. First, both need for
achievement and workaholic job behaviors were found to predict
all three engagement measures. Second, engagement, particularly
dedication, predicted various work outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction,
intent to quit). Third, engagement, again, particularly
dedication, predicted various psychological well-being outcomes
but less strongly than these predicted work outcomes.
Questions of causality cannot be addressed since data were
collected at only one point in time. Longitudinal studies
are needed to determine the effects of work life experiences
on engagement. Organizations can increase levels of work engagement by
creating supportive work experiences (e.g., control, rewards
and recognition) consistent with effective human resource
management practices. But caution must be exercised before
employing North American practices in the Turkish context.
Organizations today are grappling with new challenges as
they strive to remain competitive. These include increased
financial turbulence, heightened performance pressures,
new technology, an increasingly diverse workforce, and the
globalization of business (Burke & Cooper, 2004; O'Toole
& Lawler, 2006; Sisodia, Wolfe & Sheth, 2007). Organizational
leaders are increasingly concluding that a unique competitive
advantage resides in their human resources; all other potential
competitive advantages (e.g. technology, capital, products)
can be either bought or copied (Gratton, 2000; Lawler, 2003;
2008; Pfeffer, 1994, 1998; Burke & Cooper, 2005).
|