In Europe, before the financial crisis and the relevant economic downturn, the policy
debate turned around the choice of the best strategy to be adopted in order to relaunch
the competitiveness of the European Union (EU) member countries. After decades of
income and technological convergence towards the US frontier, the pace of expansion of Europe
fell behind that of the US from the mid-1990s, especially due to the widening in
productivity dynamics. The Atlantic divide, in terms of the capability to innovate, was one of the
key factors widely recognized to drive the US-EU growth divergence, and
accordingly, strengthening the knowledge base of the EU countries was almost unanimously
considered the most proper initiative to restore their ability to grow in a long-run perspective.
Attention has been paid by both scholars and policy makers to the role played by
knowledge capabilities in explaining the growth disparities among, and within, the EU
countries, industries, firms and, not secondarily, regions. The latter represent a privileged
perspective to understand the real chances of
Europe to rebound, since they allow one to take
into account the within-country heterogeneity in industry specialization and
innovation capability, as well as the economic interdependence within the EU economic space,
that both administrative boundaries and industry classifications tend to disguise. The
present paper builds upon recent evidence on the drivers of regional economic growth in
Europe, namely R&D investment and human capital endowment, and extends this line of
research by looking for the channels through which these kinds of investment translate into
increases in regional income levels. While it is well-established that Per Capita GDP (PCGDP)
growth is higher in regions well-endowed with highly educated workers, devoting larger resources
to research activities, the importance of such factors for the dynamics of employment and
labor productivity remains relatively unexplored. To this goal, the paper decomposes PCGDP
growth into changes in both output per worker and employment ratio, and separately estimates
a growth equation for each of these indicators by using, as explanatory variables, a wide array
of knowledge measures and structural characteristics (along with the typical controls
adopted in this kind of estimations). We perform both a standard (OLS-based) and a spatial
(ML-based) regression for 150 developed NUTS 2 regions of the EU over the period
1995-2002, which is a crucial time interval for the widening in the EU-US growth differentials. |