Introducing new products into the market is an important way for firms to enhance
their competitive advantage (Kumar and Phrommathed, 2005). In particular, firms now
place emphasis on the following strategies in New Product Development (NPD)
innovation - first mover advantage, fast product introduction, better product functionality and
shorter product life cycles (Davila,
2000). To implement these strategies, academics and
practitioners stress the importance of Management Control Systems (MCS) within firms. We follow
Bisbe and Otley (2004) to define MCS in that it refers to the processes utilized by the
organizational participants to mobilize resources and action towards some individual or shared interests.
According to Cooper (2001, p. 4), "NPD innovation is one of the riskiest, yet
most important endeavors of the modern corporation." An example of the risk is the
uncertainty in the market acceptance of the new product. To minimize risks, managers employ MCS
to keep NPD innovation projects on track (Bonner, 2005). The MCS in an NPD
innovation context is thus, a "mechanism used to influence the means and achieved desired ends
by specifying and monitoring the behavior and activities to be followed by the NPD
innovation team" (Bonner et al., 2002, p. 234).
One common MCS in NPD innovation used by firms is the `Stage-Gate' process.
This process comprises groups of development activities classified as `stages' which are
evaluated for resource allocation decisions at specific points known as `gates'. Early research in this
area carried out extensive studies of several projects and proposed different stage-gate
process models (Cooper and Kleinschmidt, 1987; Wheelwright and Clark, 1992; and Barnett
and Clark, 1998). While these process models enhance the extant NPD innovation
literature, disagreement exists regarding the usefulness of these models (and generally MCS) for a
firm's NPD innovation efforts (Eisenhardt and Brown, 1995). |