| Pub. Date | : Oct' 2023 |
|---|---|
| Product Name | : The IUP Journal of Law Review |
| Product Type | : Article |
| Product Code | : IJLR011023 |
| Author Name | : Anil Balhera |
| Availability | : YES |
| Subject/Domain | : Arts & Humanities |
| Download Format | : PDF Format |
| No. of Pages | : 19 |
University vice chancellor (VC) appointments are plagued by recurring controversies. Whispers abound about political influence, questionable considerations, disregard for excellence, and ethical concerns, leading to terminations, post-tenure investigations, and allegations of disproportionate wealth. These issues raise red flags about the appointment process and the conduct of some individuals entrusted with such a crucial position. The VC plays a pivotal role in shaping the university's trajectory. As academic leader and administrative head, the VC bridges the gap between these two vital wings. Since India's independence, Commissions chaired by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, D S Kothari, T G Gnanam, and Ramlal Parikh have all emphasized the critical importance of this post for the overall development of any university. It noted, as per the norm, the VC should be an eminent academician, an excellent administrator, and also someone who has a high moral stature. The recent controversy surrounding VC appointments has opened a new chapter in the already strained relationship between the central government and states. The lack of transparency and fairness in VC appointments has fueled demands for reform. In several southern states, independent voices have urged political parties contesting assembly elections to include a promise of high-level investigations into appointment irregularities and broader higher education reforms in their manifestos. Given this context, this study delves into the legal and constitutional complexities surrounding VC appointments in Indian universities.
The University Grants Commission (UGC) Act of 1956 was established to regulate and maintain educational standards in universities. Section 12 outlines the Commission's duties, while Section 14 addresses the consequences of universities failing to comply with its recommendations. Section 26 grants the authority to enact regulations. In 2000, the UGC issued a regulation (dated April 4, 2000) outlining minimum qualifications for teachers in universities and affiliated institutions. However, this regulation did not specify any qualifications for the position of "Pro Chancellor" or "Vice Chancellor."